#SIMULATION ARGUMENT CODE#
#SIMULATION ARGUMENT FREE#

I think we are disagreeing on a technicality here, without going into too much detail, about whether the interferences you mention are in our simulation are external to it.

#SIMULATION ARGUMENT FREE#

Just go out and learn what you can and search for things that make life better or you happier.Р”Р„s I said, if you believe in, or know about a destiny, god's plan, simulation creator interference, or otherwise lack of free will, then it is a different conversation. Fear of the unknown is something different and in my opinion pointless for most of us. Not knowing may prevent us from making further scientific leaps in understanding, but it is not scary or a source of pain or dread or unhappiness to not know you don't know. It's like before knowing the world was round, or that we are the center of a solar system, or the concept of gravity, or a basic understanding of our own cells or systems of the body. That is not to say it is not interesting to ponder over, worth investigating these ideas, and that if one day science does reveal more answers to us on our even more basic components or our meaning of life or otherwise, having those answers won't affect our day to day life, because they will. but that is not what this video is implying. Should you happened think that the simulation theory also includes a lack of free will or a programmed future, destiny per se, then that is a little scary like a rug being pulled from under you, but also then completely out of our control so not worth stressing over. I think the point is that as long as we don't understand the origin of the tiny sub-microscopic components that make up ourselves and the world around us (as in we never see outside of the box, or you never see the world on LSD) then it really doesn't have a bearing on our day to day lives or our decisions, so long as you believe we actually do have free will. being molded by some sort of creator in their image etc. being an organism made up of lines of naturally or randomly occurring DNA/cells v.

#SIMULATION ARGUMENT CODE#

It sounds like you more have a fear of not knowing, or a 'FOMO' really than an actual fear of being in a simulation made up of lines of code written by another being v. Try to answer just one of your own questions and then tell me that makes it bad or scary to be in a simulation. Look at the current simulations we have of molecules and atoms, they take hours to crunch but only describe a few microseconds, but they are still useful! If this universe somehow increased it's complexity by creating our own simulations then the 'computer' running our simulation would just run slower, which we wouldn't notice. But if they would want to make a realistic simulation they would ofc make sure the the simulations rules were similar to those experienced by those creating the simulation (assuming they want to know things about their own world).Р”Р„lso much of the 'processing power' discussion is completely irrelevant if you accept that the simulation isn't running in 'real time'. So just like we would find it easier to make a to make a 2D simulation instead of 3D, they could have access to a higher speed of light, 'smaller atoms' etc. They failed to mention that the laws of physics could be different in the level of reality above us. So save yourself some time and don't reply. I decided I won't reply to you, since I'm sure I will be simply repeating myself over and over again. But this video flopped for me for bringing a real person in it. They have already done it a couple of times with other channels. I guess you can agree with me it was just a giant adveritsement for Vsauce3's channel, which is not bad per se. The whole topic is just uninteresting to me since it isn't really scientific. Yeah, to be honest I did rejected it also because it makes so many assumptions, which is NOT what Kurzgesagt's videos are about. You literally rejected the information the video had to offer

I suggest you to re-read the part where I explicitly say I watch Kurzgesagt's videos because of the information and the eye-catching visuals. It seems like you just watch it because it caught your eye That's the whole point I'm trying to make from the very beginning. Being interrupted made me lose interest in the topic. You really don't care about the topic if that's the case The video is 8:45 minutes long, so I watched roughly one third of the content.

As I stated in my previous post, I turned off the video after the guy made his 2nd appareance in it, which happens at 2:56.

Simulation argument